[GE users] HPC Blog Aggregation

Reuti reuti at staff.uni-marburg.de
Wed Jul 25 15:10:24 BST 2007

    [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "ISO-8859-10" character set.  ]
    [ Some special characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

Am 25.07.2007 um 14:34 schrieb Andreas.Haas at Sun.COM:

> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Rayson Ho wrote:
>> Nice!!
>> I hope to write something on Cadence/SGE integration for my next  
>> article:
>> "Distributed jobs in Analog Design Environment using Sun Grid Engine"
>> Basically, it will be a cleanup of:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.cad.cadence/browse_thread/ 
>> thread/9362860f6486bafe/40efb2d2bbc2947f#40efb2d2bbc2947f
>> Rayson
> Sounds promising!
> Have you noted
>   http://open.rsp.com.au/?page_id=11
> it describes a feature enhancement Rising Sun Pictures is planning
> to work on.

Looks interesting - more complex dependences are a still missing  
feature in SGE. But I wonder, whether it wouldn't be more straight  
forward to implement dependences in general as it seems to be present  
in Condor (http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/manual/ 
v6.9/2_11DAGMan_Applications.html), with array jobs just being a  
special case of it. Hence giving one option "qsub -job  
<job_control_file>" and all job details for the to be used scripts  
and dependencies are described in the job_control_file (and  
additional options from the original qsub command line may be used in  
addition then for each submitted job).

Putting it all in the command line with "-hold_jid_ad" doesn't look  
expandable for the general case in the future.

-- Reuti

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help at gridengine.sunsource.net

More information about the gridengine-users mailing list