[GE users] SGE questions

Andreas.Haas at Sun.COM Andreas.Haas at Sun.COM
Fri Mar 2 11:17:37 GMT 2007

Dear John,

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, john.li at mindspeed.com wrote:

> Slowly ... that could be an overhasty conclusion. Until now the case is
> not yet clear at all. Note also this here is an open-source project
> mailing list. This means that you may not perceive my email as kind of a
> feature announcements mail.
> I wish the umask issue could be resolved asap.  Currently, in my
> production
> environment,(v6u8) my users have to setup cron jobs to change file
> permissions
> since we have no control of it.  This may not be a big issue for people
> who start with SGE, but it is just one more reason for LSF user to resist
> the change.

Understood. Please look at


could you confirm this RFE would resolve this issue, based on how 
you changed umask-code in v61beta source files and the evaluation 
you made then?

>> I still think it
>> would be much
>> easier for the users if he/she does have to specifying the full path to
>> run a script,
>> which we do at almost 100% of the time.
> I understand having qsub to reject any path that is not a full path
> would be the ideal solution. Is that correct?
> Yes, the ideal solution is to have SGE search the $PATH for the script,
> just like when submitting a binary exectable.

Ok. Please look at


and let me know if you agree with this bug description and it's 
proposed resolution.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help at gridengine.sunsource.net

More information about the gridengine-users mailing list