[GE users] per-host vs. per-queue consumable

murple andreas.kuntzagk at mdc-berlin.de
Tue Nov 3 09:08:22 GMT 2009


reuti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am 02.11.2009 um 10:05 schrieb murple:
> 
>> to account for used cores I have added a per-host consumable. This
>> mostly works. But now I need to bypass this check for some jobs.
>> Is it possible to define an additional queue for these jobs and "give"
>> this queue more of the complex? Or is there another way of bypassing
>> this resource check?
> 
> why did you set up a custom complex for the slots? This can be setup  
> in an RQS (resource quota set) which you could adjust for certain  
> users or hosts.

The solution using a complex is what this list suggested. Or at least 
what I understood when I asked how to account for users running 
multithreaded programms. I don't know anything about RQS. Do they exist 
in 6.2?

> In fact, having a custom complex makes it quite easy to bypass:
> 
> $ qsub -l mycores=0 ...

I just noticed that myself. Luckily all my users are well-behaved.

regards, Andreas

------------------------------------------------------
http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=38&dsMessageId=224778

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net].



More information about the gridengine-users mailing list