[GE users] per-host vs. per-queue consumable

reuti reuti at staff.uni-marburg.de
Tue Nov 3 09:28:09 GMT 2009


Am 03.11.2009 um 10:08 schrieb murple:

> reuti wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 02.11.2009 um 10:05 schrieb murple:
>>
>>> to account for used cores I have added a per-host consumable. This
>>> mostly works. But now I need to bypass this check for some jobs.
>>> Is it possible to define an additional queue for these jobs and  
>>> "give"
>>> this queue more of the complex? Or is there another way of bypassing
>>> this resource check?
>>
>> why did you set up a custom complex for the slots? This can be setup
>> in an RQS (resource quota set) which you could adjust for certain
>> users or hosts.
>
> The solution using a complex is what this list suggested.

No, just define a PE and request the necessary number of slots (and  
for SMP job with allocation_rule $pe_slots). No custom complex  
necessary.

> Or at least
> what I understood when I asked how to account for users running
> multithreaded programms. I don't know anything about RQS. Do they  
> exist
> in 6.2?

Yep.

-- Reuti


>> In fact, having a custom complex makes it quite easy to bypass:
>>
>> $ qsub -l mycores=0 ...
>
> I just noticed that myself. Luckily all my users are well-behaved.
>
> regards, Andreas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ds/viewMessage.do? 
> dsForumId=38&dsMessageId=224778
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users- 
> unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net].

------------------------------------------------------
http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=38&dsMessageId=224780

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net].



More information about the gridengine-users mailing list