[GE users] Reservations and calendar problem

reuti reuti at staff.uni-marburg.de
Wed Mar 10 18:24:19 GMT 2010


Am 10.03.2010 um 18:35 schrieb cru:

> I'm having trouble with job reservations in 6.2u3.
>
> We're trying to achieve two things with reservations:
>
> 1) Service days - there's a calendar entry setting the queue to off  
> for
> a few hours every six weeks. This works as it should and jobs with  
> h_rt
> such that they would run into the service period don't start until  
> after
> the service period.
>
> 2) Forcing the system to drain when parallel jobs get to the front of
> the queue, stopping smaller jobs with lower queue priority from  
> filling
> the gaps (other than by back fill).
>
> To achieve the second goal, we set the default for all jobs to use "-R
> y" and then allow a small number of reservations. My understanding of
> this is that the first few jobs in the queue should have reservations
> created and the scheduler will only back fill jobs around these.
>
> I've never been completely convinced this works and so, a few days  
> ago,
> when the queue state was such that the reservation was important (a 64
> cpu job was stuck at the front of the queue) I enabled scheduler
> monitoring and looked at "schedule" file to see when the  
> reservation was
> created.
>
> What I discovered was that all of the reservations started at the  
> end of
> the next service period which is still five weeks away. This was  
> despite
> it being obvious from the state of what was running that there  
> should be
> a suitable sized slot on the system within a few days. The stuck 64  
> cpu
> job also only requested 1 day of runtime so it would also complete
> before the next service day once started.

which runtime was requested by the job which were already in the system?

-- Reuti

>
> My assumption from this is that, because the service day calendar
> setting relies on creating a reservation (if you set the allowed  
> number
> of reservations to 0, service days with calendars don't work), the
> reservations take on a priority such that the job reservations can't
> happen until after the calendar reservation.
>
> Is my assumption correct? If so, is this the intended behaviour?  
> Again,
> if so, how do I achieve what I was trying to do be another method?
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Dr Chris Rudge - Research Computing Services Manager
> IT Services, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH
>
> Tel.  +44 (0)116 2522223
> chris.rudge at le.ac.uk
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ds/viewMessage.do? 
> dsForumId=38&dsMessageId=247866
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users- 
> unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net].

------------------------------------------------------
http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=38&dsMessageId=247873

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net].



More information about the gridengine-users mailing list