[GE users] Reservations and calendar problem

reuti reuti at staff.uni-marburg.de
Wed Mar 10 19:33:05 GMT 2010


Am 10.03.2010 um 20:26 schrieb cru:

> At the time there were approximately 300 single cpu jobs with a 4.5  
> day runtime

And this was requested with -l h_rt=108:0:0 ?

-- Reuti


> - i.e. there would obviously be a gap on the system to run the 64  
> cpu, 1 day, job well before the service period defined by the  
> calendar which is 5 weeks away.
>
> The "schedule" file showed that every reservation created, even for  
> serial jobs, was for after the service period.
>
> Chris
>
>>> What I discovered was that all of the reservations started at the
>>> end of
>>> the next service period which is still five weeks away. This was
>>> despite
>>> it being obvious from the state of what was running that there
>>> should be
>>> a suitable sized slot on the system within a few days. The stuck 64
>>> cpu
>>> job also only requested 1 day of runtime so it would also complete
>>> before the next service day once started.
>>
>> which runtime was requested by the job which were already in the
>> system?
>>
>> -- Reuti
>>
>
>
> Dr Chris Rudge - Research Computing Services Manager
>
> IT Services, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH
> Tel: 0116 2522223
>
> Times Higher Education University of the year 2008/9
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=38&dsMessageId=247883
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net 
> ].
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=38&dsMessageId=247884

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net].



More information about the gridengine-users mailing list