[GE users] [OT] SGE and Eucayptus clouds

seandavi seandavi at gmail.com
Fri Mar 12 19:14:58 GMT 2010

    [ The following text is in the "utf-8" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "ISO-8859-10" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:08 PM, iank <ikaufman at ucsd.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:55 AM, seandavi <seandavi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> We are a government lab and paying for Amazon cloud time is likely to
>> be problematic.  I wondered if anyone had thoughts or experience with
>> using SGE's new abilities to add nodes dynamically to a private cloud,
>> such as a Eucalyptus cloud (http://open.eucalyptus.com/)?  We don't
>> have such a cloud in place, but I would like to know what other folks
>> are thinking about the issues of SGE and private/institutional clouds.
> This is something I have looked into a little, but not enough to really say
> much yet. I support a group that is very interested. I am also looking into
> OpenNebula, since it also integrates with SGE somewhat to manage
> Xen, VMWare and KVM images as well as Eucalyptus like cloud images.
> One advantage is that once the "job" terminates, the image is still retained
> as opposed to getting deleted.
> The OpenNebula documentation has very good examples regarding using
> SGE to dynamically manage your cloud.

Thanks, Ian.  OpenNebula does look a little bit more mature than
Eucalyptus.  I'll look into it in more detail.



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net].

More information about the gridengine-users mailing list