[GE users] User Priorities

bdbaddog bill at baddogconsulting.com
Sat May 15 01:51:21 BST 2010

    [ The following text is in the "utf-8" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "ISO-8859-10" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:22 AM, jebnor <jebnor at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:22 AM, mlelstv <mlelstv at serpens.de> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:53:16PM +0200, reuti wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > one option could be to put all the less important jobs on hold
>> > (`qhold`) and release (`qrls`) them later again when the short jobs
>> > are done.
>> Aren't job shares meant for this?
> My understanding is that job shares are finite allocations of resources for
> a particular group,job, project, etc.  I have the Share-tree policy to take
> care of that.

Could you submit a dummy job which depends on the new jobs (via
-hold_jid), and then qalter the other jobs to depend on that dummy job
via -hold_jid?



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe at gridengine.sunsource.net].

More information about the gridengine-users mailing list