[Imported from gridengine issuezilla ​http://gridengine.sunsource.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2612]

        Issue #:      2612             Platform:     All      Reporter: roland (roland)
       Component:     gridengine          OS:        All
     Subcomponent:    clients          Version:      6.1u4       CC:    None defined
        Status:       NEW              Priority:     P3
      Resolution:                     Issue type:    DEFECT
                                   Target milestone: ---
      Assigned to:    roland (roland)
      QA Contact:     roland
          URL:
       * Summary:     qhold should allow -h n
   Status whiteboard:
      Attachments:

     Issue 2612 blocks:
   Votes for issue 2612:


   Opened: Fri Jun 13 02:18:00 -0700 2008 
------------------------


The qhold command rejects to release a hold

% qhold -h n 6646
qalter: ERROR! Unknown hold list "n" specified to -h option

This should be possible and also described in the help output and the man page

   ------- Additional comments from reuti Sun Jun 15 04:31:12 -0700 2008 -------
qrls can be used for it. Will this command be abandoned then?

[Imported from gridengine issuezilla ​http://gridengine.sunsource.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2621]

        Issue #:      2621             Platform:     All           Reporter: andreas (andreas)
       Component:     gridengine          OS:        All
     Subcomponent:    kernel           Version:      6.2              CC:
                                                                             [_] bbarth
                                                                             [_] reuti
                                                                             [_] Remove selected CCs
        Status:       NEW              Priority:     P3
      Resolution:                     Issue type:    ENHANCEMENT
                                   Target milestone: ---
      Assigned to:    ernst (ernst)
      QA Contact:     andreas
          URL:        http://wiki.gridengine.info/wiki/index.php/PresubmissionProcedures
       * Summary:     Need presubmission procedures
   Status whiteboard:
      Attachments:

     Issue 2621 blocks:
   Votes for issue 2621:


   Opened: Thu Jun 19 08:23:00 -0700 2008 
------------------------


There is a need for a plug-in interface that allows jobs be verified/modified in
accordance with site-specific needs:

- idea is to implement a general purpose shared library plug-in interface
- the plug-in would facilitate customized job verification/modification
- SGE would however contain only a plug-in that forks/execs/waits a script-based
plug-in
- the need for the superior (performance) shared library general purpose plug-in
interface  exists actually only for sites where raw masses of jobs float through
SGE every day
- for load-balancing a qsub/qrsh/qsh/qlogin/qmon plug-in were ideal
- for maximum of control a qmaster plug-in were ideal
- contradicting objectives (load-balancing vs. maximum of control) suggest both
qmaster and qsub/qrsh/qsh/qlogin/qmon should get a plug-in interface
- must prevent qalter can be used to bypass policy implemented via plug-ins

   ------- Additional comments from reuti Fri Jun 20 05:51:09 -0700 2008 -------
Can someome please mark http://gridengine.sunsource.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2593 as a duplicate
of this. - Thx - Reuti

   ------- Additional comments from andreas Fri Jun 20 06:10:02 -0700 2008 -------
*** Issue 2593 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

   ------- Additional comments from andreas Fri Jun 20 06:38:59 -0700 2008 -------
Added URL to specification document that is in the works.

   ------- Additional comments from ernst Tue Sep 23 04:53:23 -0700 2008 -------
Today I sent a specification draft to the users mailing list (subject: job
submission verifier)

   ------- Additional comments from ernst Tue Jan 13 07:19:33 -0700 2009 -------
Script based solution is implemented and feature will be available with 6.2u2.
If performace of this solution becomes an issue we might also add support for
shared libraray JSVs easyly.

[Imported from gridengine issuezilla ​http://gridengine.sunsource.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2623]

   Issue #: 2623   Platform: All   Reporter: inducer (inducer)
   Component: gridengine   OS: All
   Subcomponent: gui   Version: 6.2beta   CC: None defined
   Status: NEW   Priority: P3
   Resolution:   Issue type: ENHANCEMENT
     Target milestone: ---
   Assigned to: andre (andre)
   QA Contact: andre
   URL:
   * Summary: qmon icons are terrifyingly bad
   Status whiteboard:
   Attachments:
   Date/filename:                                          Description:                                                                                                                            Submitted by:
   Mon Jun 1 19:37:00 -0700 2009: sge_icons_trial.bmp      Quick trial using existing tango icons for qmon (not all are perfect, but they look a lot better then the current drawings) (image/bmp) alain
   Mon Apr 5 20:45:00 -0700 2010: qmon_updated_icons_1.tgz Proposal for a new sets of icons for QMON. These new icons can be tested on existing GE installation. (application/octet-stream)        alain
     Issue 2623 blocks:
   Votes for issue 2623:  7

   Opened: Fri Jun 20 13:09:00 -0700 2008 
------------------------


Hi there,

The qmon icons are terrifyingly bad. Even a text UI would be better. But maybe
you can get in touch with the nice people at
http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Desktop_Project, they may be willing to
design some icons for you. This is especially true since many of GE's concepts
(job, user, etc) are broadly applicable.

Thanks,
Andreas

   ------- Additional comments from alain Mon Jun 1 19:37:16 -0700 2009 -------
Created an attachment (id=191)
Quick trial using existing tango icons for qmon (not all are perfect, but they look a lot better then the current drawings)

   ------- Additional comments from inducer Mon Jun 1 19:44:27 -0700 2009 -------
Oh, that's already a lot better. Please get this into the shipped product as quickly as possible. :)

Now if you could also replace the "+++" in the title bars with just a dash, I'd almost feel like I'm using production-quality software. :P

   ------- Additional comments from rayson Mon Jun 1 20:08:53 -0700 2009 -------
Looks good! As the icons are released to the Public Domain, we don't need to worry about licensing issues.

And what qmon changes are needed if I want to try the new icons now?

   ------- Additional comments from olesen Thu Jun 4 00:28:55 -0700 2009 -------
the silk icons (http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/) aren't bad either - it's what we're using with xmlqstat

   ------- Additional comments from alain Mon Apr 5 20:45:53 -0700 2010 -------
Created an attachment (id=201)
Proposal for a new sets of icons for QMON. These new icons can be tested on existing GE installation.