Opened 12 years ago

Last modified 11 years ago

#753 new defect

IZ3203: qconf -aprj should accept project name

Reported by: bovine Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: sge Version: 6.2u3
Severity: Keywords: clients


[Imported from gridengine issuezilla]

        Issue #:      3203             Platform:     All      Reporter: bovine (bovine)
       Component:     gridengine          OS:        All
     Subcomponent:    clients          Version:      6.2u3       CC:
                                                                        [_] stephendennis
                                                                        [_] Remove selected CCs
        Status:       NEW              Priority:     P3
      Resolution:                     Issue type:    DEFECT
                                   Target milestone: ---
      Assigned to:    roland (roland)
      QA Contact:     roland
       * Summary:     qconf -aprj should accept project name
   Status whiteboard:

     Issue 3203 blocks:
   Votes for issue 3203:

   Opened: Tue Dec 1 17:47:00 -0700 2009 

It seems that almost all of the object types that are creatable through qconf -axxx now allow the object name to be specified on the
command-line and it will be used to pre-populate the template in the editor.  One notable object that does not yet allow this is projects
through the "qconf -aprj" option.

Adding this functionality is a convenience to the admin, since typically the name is the only required field that needs to be specified.
This would also simplify automation by allowing simple one-liners such as:

env EDITOR=touch qconf -aprj moocow

(This technique is already possible for most of the other object types today.)

Change History (0)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.