Opened 16 years ago

Last modified 9 years ago

#92 new enhancement

IZ548: Want suspend/release thresholds

Reported by: opoplawski Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: sge Version: 6.0u4
Severity: Keywords: scheduling
Cc:

Description

[Imported from gridengine issuezilla http://gridengine.sunsource.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=548]

        Issue #:      548              Platform:     All           Reporter: opoplawski (opoplawski)
       Component:     gridengine          OS:        All
     Subcomponent:    scheduling       Version:      6.0u4            CC:
                                                                             [_] uddeborg
                                                                             [_] Remove selected CCs
        Status:       NEW              Priority:     P3
      Resolution:                     Issue type:    ENHANCEMENT
                                   Target milestone: ---
      Assigned to:    andreas (andreas)
      QA Contact:     andreas
          URL:
       * Summary:     Want suspend/release thresholds
   Status whiteboard:
      Attachments:

     Issue 548 blocks:
   Votes for issue 548:  18


   Opened: Thu May 8 08:03:00 -0700 2003 
------------------------


Need hysteresis in the suspend system to avoid
continually suspending/releasing jobs.  True of
any kind of negative feedback system

With the current system, you cannot achieve a
target per processor load ave of 1, particularly
on a multi-processor machine.  One job will be
continually suspended/released as the system
cycles above and below the threshold.

Simple fix might be to use the "load threshold"
for submitting new jobs as the lower bound.
Otherwise, the suspend table should be split into
two columns, one for upper and lower bounds.

   ------- Additional comments from opoplawski Tue Oct 18 15:52:30 -0700 2005 -------
Still want for 6.0u4

   ------- Additional comments from sgrell Wed Oct 19 00:19:10 -0700 2005 -------
Changed category, since the scheduler makes these decissions.

Stephan

   ------- Additional comments from opoplawski Tue Mar 28 15:27:00 -0700 2006 -------
Any possible timeframe for this?  It really makes running SGE queue on personal
workstations very inefficient.

   ------- Additional comments from andreas Fri Sep 28 08:22:14 -0700 2007 -------
*** Issue 2371 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

Change History (0)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.